How can you implement a union between two result sets in a Graphical calculation view?

The correct answer involves excluding the ADDRESS field from the union when implementing a union between two result sets in a graphical calculation view. In graphical calculation views, unions are performed to combine data from multiple sources that need to have the same structure in terms of column definitions. If two result sets contain an ADDRESS field but with different data types or formats, it can lead to incompatibility issues during the union operation.

Excluding the ADDRESS field allows you to focus on the other columns that do match or can be coerced to match between the result sets. This ensures that the union operation is successful and the resultant data set retains the relevant fields without mismatches that could prevent the union from being processed correctly. When designing your calculation views, it's essential to ensure compatibility in the intersecting fields to achieve the desired output effectively.

Considering other options: mapping the ADDRESS field to a constant value or creating an input parameter for it might lead to unnecessary complexities, and creating a restricted column may not be relevant when unifying datasets. Focusing on the compatible fields by excluding non-aligning ones prevents data integrity issues.